Recently, while debugging some strange problems with our build, I flipped on MSBuild’s
diagnostic output level. I was surprised and delighted to see a profile of my build at the end of the output. Here’s what the output looks like for CruiseControl.Net’s clean target:
Project Performance Summary: 16 ms C:\code\ccnet-trunk\project\CCTray\CCTray.csproj 1 calls 16 ms Clean 1 calls 16 ms C:\code\ccnet-trunk\project\CCTrayLib\CCTrayLib.csproj 1 calls 16 ms Clean 1 calls 16 ms C:\code\ccnet-trunk\project\service\service.csproj 1 calls 16 ms Clean 1 calls 16 ms C:\code\ccnet-trunk\project\console\console.csproj 1 calls 16 ms Clean 1 calls 16 ms C:\code\ccnet-trunk\project\objection\objection.csproj 1 calls 16 ms Clean 1 calls 16 ms C:\code\ccnet-trunk\project\WebDashboard\WebDashboard.csproj 1 calls 16 ms Clean 1 calls 16 ms C:\code\ccnet-trunk\project\UnitTests\UnitTests.csproj 1 calls 16 ms Clean 1 calls 16 ms C:\code\ccnet-trunk\project\core\core.csproj 1 calls 16 ms Clean 1 calls 16 ms C:\code\ccnet-trunk\project\Remote\Remote.csproj 1 calls 16 ms Clean 1 calls 31 ms C:\code\ccnet-trunk\project\Validator\Validator.csproj 1 calls 31 ms Clean 1 calls 297 ms C:\code\ccnet-trunk\project\ccnet.sln 1 calls 297 ms clean 1 calls Target Performance Summary: 0 ms CleanReferencedProjects 10 calls 0 ms SplitProjectReferencesByType 8 calls 0 ms BeforeClean 10 calls 0 ms ValidateToolsVersions 1 calls 0 ms AfterClean 10 calls 0 ms CleanPublishFolder 10 calls 16 ms _CheckForInvalidConfigurationAndPlatform 10 calls 16 ms _SplitProjectReferencesByFileExistence 10 calls 16 ms ValidateSolutionConfiguration 1 calls 141 ms CoreClean 10 calls 281 ms Clean 11 calls Task Performance Summary: 0 ms FindUnderPath 20 calls 0 ms AssignProjectConfiguration 8 calls 0 ms Message 21 calls 0 ms MakeDir 10 calls 0 ms RemoveDuplicates 10 calls 16 ms WriteLinesToFile 10 calls 31 ms ReadLinesFromFile 10 calls 78 ms Delete 11 calls 281 ms MSBuild 4 calls
It’s quite easy to change the verbosity level from NAnt’s MSBuild task:
<msbuild verbosity="Diagnostic" project="project\ccnet.sln"> <property name="Configuration" value="Build" /> </msbuild>
I was happy to see profiling information because the speed of the build in Visual Studio on our current project is making unit tests painful. Running a single unit test involves waiting for about a minute while the code compiles and ReSharper’s test runner starts up. Then the test runs, generally taking less than a second. The profiling output from MSBuild seems like an ideal way to diagnose the compile speed problem. I played around with different output settings to understand what’s available before tackling the build speed problem. After all, measuring something usually changes it.
One of the first things I noticed was that using the Diagnostic verbosity level very significantly slowed my build down. I decided to quantify that slow down, and check to make sure that the other verbosity levels don’t suffer from a similar problem. Here are the summarized results.
|total time||std deviation|
I did 5 builds at each level, and averaged the results. Since I needed to clean anyway between each test, I gathered those stats too. MSBuild provides the information in milliseconds, but I am presenting it in seconds. It seems like Normal is a reasonable setting where the output doesn’t slow the build down significantly. Minimal is slightly faster, and I prefer it anyway because I find the terser output easier to follow.
To gather timings for different verbosities, I didn’t use NAnt, but instead invoked
msbuild directly from the command-line. Of the available verbosity levels, only Diagnostic gives the performance summary. Luckily, there is another switch that allows more fine-grained tuning of what appears on the console. Here are a couple of examples, but
msbuild /? can give you more information.
C:\code\ccnet-trunk\project>msbuild ccnet.sln /verbosity:Diagnostic C:\code\ccnet-trunk\project>msbuild ccnet.sln /target:clean /consoleloggerparameters:verbosity=normal;PerformanceSummary
Before jumping to conclusions about MSBuild’s performance, I wanted to check if the slowdown is tied to using Diagnostic level at all, or just using it on the console. After all, the windows command prompt is known to be a bit of a slouch. I tried a build with Diagnostic level logging being sent to a file:
C:\code\ccnet-trunk\project>msbuild ccnet.sln /noconsolelogger /filelogger /fileloggerparameters:verbosity=Diagnostic;PerformanceSummary
With these settings, the build takes only 15.2 seconds, but still generates the full 1.5 megabytes of diagnostic logs. It seems the performance problem really lies with Windows Command Prompt. I want to try to determine if logging suffers the same penalties during a build on a continuous integration server or through Visual Studio. I have not yet discovered how to tweak the verbosity level from Visual Studio. For the CI server, I simply have not yet bothered to do the test. If there is a slowdown during CI, a simple fix may be to log all the output to a file and then include that in the build artifacts.
For now though, I’m planning on tweaking my solution structure as Patrick Smacchia suggests to see if there is a noticeable build speed improvement.